1/2
Title
Topic
Date
Start
End
Count
Comment
Dann
Dann Thombs
May 18, 2013 1:10 AM
I've always been confused with the lineage of the Goggles, with all the variations. Some updated in 1999, and some had the H2O variant. What's the deal with the E Frame. What's the Ski Goggle. I may answer all these questions while researching this post.

Here's what I have based on the DB and some catalogs.

Catalogs:
1988 - Shows O Frame, L Frame, and Pro Frame. Half of each picture has the tear off tabs. I always assumed tear off tabs meant MX goggle vs just a clear snow goggle. Certainly is the case now, but I'm wondering when the O Frame Snow actually came out. I imagine the name O Frame MX wasn't used initially since there wasn't a need to have motorcross vs snow. I had the snow one listed as just O Frame for a long time, but it's best to add the Snow to be more specific. All colors on this catalog are solid.

1992 - Ski Report catalog. I have the 'Ski Goggle' listed in the DB, but if the O Frame Snow didn't come out in the 80's like I thought, then that it what we see here. The frames are in the Carbon Fiber print, so they aren't simple solid colors any more. They mention the CF is a new option. Lens tints are Black Iridium, Orange Iridium, Violet Iridium, Rust, and Clear, which is consistent with the times.

1993 - Officially mentions O Frame/Pro Frame as the Ski Goggle System (everything was a system, Blade System, Mumbo Deflection System). E Frame appears and is Snow specific. I Believe an MX version only appeared a year or two ago. More frame options like Purple Haze and other crackle prints. All lenses are dual layer, but still Lexan. Coated with Nofogium III (yeah that didn't catch on) Rust Becomes Persimmon (not becomes, but is replaced since they are different, but serve similar functions and were in parallel with the M Frames). E Frame seems smaller, and lacks foam. Logos are all still the Classic ones naturally. I used to call this Classic Gen 2, since the colors were more advanced rather than solid, but have since combined them all. I did the same with the next batch and modern releases even thought I'm fairly certain a 1996 L Frame and 2013 one probably have some differences.

1996 - O Frame catalog. Again Pro/O/L/E Frame. E Frame specifically is listed as a single lens. Pro Frame has 'Polar Goggle Face Foam'. All lenses are said to fit every goggle. The replacement lenses in the DB seem to agree. Frame colors seem to abandon the Haze and crackles, and move to more graphical ones like Snow Jungle and Spike Yellow. Some of these have resurfaced lately. Again some with the same SKU, despite being fairly certain they aren't the same 100%. Logo is now the thin stretch.

1997 - Product Sheets. A Frame appears. Uses Plutonite lenses rather than Lexan in order to take advantage of modern optics. Snow Goggle is listed which is the same as the Ski System, comprised of Pro/O/L/E Frames. Colors are pretty much still the same. H2O Frame appears. Only the L Frame variant is mentioned specifically, but we can assume the Iridium ones are H2O Pro Frame. MX Goggle reappears, and with Pro/O/L Frames. Colors are adopted from the recent batch on the Snow Goggles.

After that, 1999 would bring an update to the O Frame, of which certain models would follow. The H2O Frame would update to the new design, and the Pro Frame MX would as well, but the Pro Frame Snow seemed to have re-emerged recently with some retro colors, and oddly enough the E Frame did too, but on the MX side.
BriP
Brian Poh
May 20, 2013 9:14 PM
Kudos dann for doing this, the goggles are a much overlooked aspect. They do have some amazing prints and some awesome designs.
yelkao
Dan
May 20, 2013 9:38 PM
This is awesome Dann. Shows true dedication!
ichibandidisan
Stanley 'True Love Hates'
May 20, 2013 9:47 PM
So the H2O and that prior one that Jim supposedly hated weren't officially goggles? What was that, 1982 or 1983?
Dann
Dann Thombs
May 20, 2013 9:50 PM
Here's what I have in the DB for dates. I have a feeling, this is where a lot of errors are. I'm only including up to the A Frame, and the modern incarnations of classics.

1980 - Oakley Goggle
1980 - O/20 Goggle

1980 - O Frame MX
1980 - Pro Frame MX
1983 - O Frame Snow
1983 - Pro Frame Snow
1983 - L Frame MX
1983 - L Frame Snow

1990 - H2O Frame (Classic Logo)
1992 - Ski Goggle (pretty sure I can remove this)

1996 - O Frame MX (Stretch Logo)
1996 - Pro Frame MX (Stretch Logo)
1996 - O Frame Snow (Stretch Logo)
1996 - Pro Frame Snow (Stretch Logo)
1996 - L Frame MX (Stretch Logo)
1996 - L Frame Snow (Stretch Logo)
1996 - E Frame (Stretch Logo)
1996 - H2O Frame (Stretch Logo)
1998 - A Frame
2000 - New O Frame MX
2000 - New Pro Frame MX
2000 - New O Frame Snow
2000 - New H2O Frame
2000 - H2O L Frame
2000 - New H2O Pro Frame

2011 - E Frame MX

Looks like I'm missing the Classic Logo E Frame, and the Pro Frame didn't update on the Snow Side. This seems to confirm that the H2O is a mod of the MX, and not the Snow.
ichibandidisan
Stanley 'True Love Hates'
May 20, 2013 10:03 PM
OK, I meant to say O/20, not H2O.
I only own the O/20 and the Crowbar goggles that were part of the London Police artist pack.
Guess the Crowbar would be post 2000 but pre-2011?
(Database shows Crowbar Snow as 2005.)
And Dann, if you could, would you also explore a little into the nose pieces that were compatible with these various goggles?
I picked up two O/21 nose pieces, both look different, but were supposed to go with the O/20.
I'll post pics when I find time later.
Possibly only one of those I have is a true O/21, the other maybe a later edition mispacked into O/21 packaging.
Dann
Dann Thombs
May 20, 2013 11:00 PM
Do you mean the Half Mask and ATFM. There was a different version that was meant for the Oakley Goggle.
Oak
Twenty Fifty
May 20, 2013 11:02 PM
It's a different mask than the ATFM. This one is suppose to be the O/21 facemask:

ichibandidisan
Stanley 'True Love Hates'
May 20, 2013 11:20 PM
I got one that looks like Oak's yellow one in black or really dark blue.
But I also got another one that's much smaller, also labelled as O/21.
I'll post pics when I get the chance.
Dann
Dann Thombs
May 20, 2013 11:38 PM
Ah, okay. I was thinking of this

ichibandidisan
Stanley 'True Love Hates'
May 20, 2013 11:45 PM
LOL, Dann. If any of those make my voice like Darth Vader's, I'll buy 10 of them.
BiGCoB
Francois C
May 21, 2013 12:11 AM


Was this one an Oakley mask, or just a compatible one ?

Found here : http://bulldogskates.websitetoolbox.com/post/show_single_post?pid=35477901&postcount=4
Dann
Dann Thombs
May 21, 2013 12:13 AM
Looks like the original, but maybe with a sticker.
ichibandidisan
Stanley 'True Love Hates'
May 21, 2013 8:50 AM






On that last comparison pic, I think the two half masks look the same, if not identical, except that one piece has a larger extended portion.
However, the smaller piece has no Oakley identification whatsoever, so it's either non-Oakley altogether, or some prototype, or simply an unmarked Oakley accessory.
Oak
Twenty Fifty
May 21, 2013 8:58 AM
Most half masks you see typically came as part of the ATFM pack, though they may have been sold separately as well as part of the O/2x line. The big mask you have pictured is definitely the O/21. It looks to me the half mask is O/21 as well, but obviously a half version.



There is another mask other than the O/20, ATFM and at least two half masks:
ichibandidisan
Stanley 'True Love Hates'
May 21, 2013 9:10 AM
Wow, Oak, that's great archival info you got there.
Seems that smaller piece I have was part of the ATFM set. I presume that bigger, vented piece in the ATFM set is marked MADE IN U.S.A. and such. Then this smaller piece would've been simply an add-on of some sort to the main piece.
Oak
Twenty Fifty
May 21, 2013 9:20 AM
I think what you have are both O/21 masks, only one is a half mask and the other a full mask as part of a set, same as how the ATFM has both a half and a full.

The half mask would've attached to the goggle by itself, just like the other masks. The ATFM and O/21 half mask functions similar to the MX O Frame Mask:

http://www.oakley.com/products/3636/11650

Dann
Dann Thombs
Nov 4, 2013 11:44 PM
Some text from the 1996 stock writeup:

GOGGLES. Oakley first entered the sports eyewear market in 1980 with its motocross goggles. Since then, Oakley has
expanded its range of goggle products to include goggles for use by athletes involved in BMX cycling, skiing and
watersports.

Oakley ski goggles (with the exception of the E-FRAME) are comprised of a layering of two single-arc lenses. The outer lens
is made of impact- and scratch-resistant Lexan. The inner lens is designed to prevent fogging or freezing. The wrap-around
lenses improve peripheral and up-and-down vision. Lens vents prevent moist air from being trapped between and behind the
lenses. A special gasket between the lenses keeps both lenses perfectly parallel, further minimizing distortion. The
coordination of a persimmon outer lens and a gray inner lens reduces glare and provides higher contrast than single-lens
systems in low-light conditions. The frame is made with a rugged urethane compound and is available in six different colors
which can be color-coordinated with available woven elastic straps.

Oakley's ski goggles are sold in four models: the O-FRAME, PRO-FRAME, E-FRAME and L-FRAME. The L-FRAME goggle is designed to fit over glasses. In
1997, the Company intends to introduce a new goggle frame that will incorporate advanced design features and improved
styling.

Oakley motocross goggles also feature the exclusive "MX Factory Pilot Tearoffs." These clear plastic covers are secured to
the goggle with a single detachable tab. When the goggles become covered with mud or rain, the rider can pull the tearoff tab
to clear the lens. Up to ten layers of plastic covers can be attached, continuously providing the rider with clear vision.
Oakley's motorcycle goggles are sold in the O-FRAME, the PRO-FRAME IRIDIUM and the L-FRAME models. The OFRAME
goggle has a single foam layer, whereas the Pro-and L-FRAME models have dual foam layers. Their design is
otherwise similar to that of the Oakley ski goggles.

Oakley's watersports goggle, the H2O, is a recent introduction to the Oakley goggle family. The H2O goggle was designed
for jetskiing, windsurfing and other similar watersports. In addition to the standard Oakley goggle features, the H2O is
treated with anti-fogging and water-repellant coatings. A closed-cell foam seals the goggle to the face while special exhaust
ports quickly drain away moisture. The closed-cell foam also provides buoyancy.
yelkao
Dan
Nov 5, 2013 3:00 PM
Seems like a lifetime ago.
Dann
Dann Thombs
Apr 15, 2015 4:27 PM
Few things I found lately to add to the knowledge-base:

I thought O Frame were all non-Iridium, and Pro Frame had Iridium. While for the MX goggles this is true, it's not the definition as the Ski Goggles have iridium and non-iridium on both.

Starting off with this ad:


It mentions the O Frame Ski Goggle System which comes in O/90 and O/90V. This matches up with the O/20 goggle which came after the original Oakley Goggle. I thought O/20 and O Frame were synonymous, but I'm starting to see that the earlier to mid parts of the 80's had the O Frame as an overarching product with breakdown into specific types. It wasn't until later that O Frame MX and O Frame Snow appeared. At this point it looks like O/20 -> O Frame MX, and O/90 -> O Frame Snow

In this ad, Iridium hasn't yet appeared, so there's just the base tint options. It only mentions the two new options: Bronze (Orange outer Lexan, and Grey anti-fog inner) and Orange (Orange outer Lexan, and Clear anti-fog inner)

Moving next to the 1988 Price list


There's the O Frame, O Frame with Iridium, Pro Frame, Pro Frame with Iridium, L Frame, and E Frame. Per the description above, the E Frame is a single layer lens, but there's nothing showing the differences between O Frame and Pro Frame aside from a $10-12 price difference.

For lenses all OEM configurations come with 'Rust' or 'Iridium'. I initially though Rust may be the Orange color mentioned earlier, but in the Accessory section there is the original Orange, Bronze, Grey, Clear, and then the new Rust and Iridium (which I'd assume is Black Iridium). Vented and non-Vented options are both there.

Following up is the 1990/91 Price List


This preludes the list with some helpful information. Prices seems to be the same but there's no mention of O Frame with Iridium, but the Pro Frame now had Orange and Violet Iridium. Looking at the skus, I noticed the 1998 list the Pro Frame only had odd numbers, so those match up with Orange Iridium, not Black like I thought. Also the -### numbers remain the same, but with 02-### being the Rust option, and 25-### being an Iridium. O Frame only had even numbers, so we would have assumed 25-023 would have been a Violet Iridium O Frame, but that didn't happen. Non-iridium options didn't fill in the gap since Rust was the only stock option. Accessory lenses filled added the Violet Iridium option


The 1990 Japanese Flyer still uses the term Mirror vs Iridium, but has Black Mirror as an accessory option. There's no mention of the O Frame, just H2O Frame and Pro Frame. H2O is non-vented, and there is a Splatter Grey frame option. The 1992 Japanese Flyer doesn't have much information

Finally the 1991 Product-wise Price List has the MX and H2O goggles on the last page


None of the stock options mention Iridium, so we're led to believe that the O Frame MX goggles were all clear, and Pro Frame MX were Iridium unless you bought a separate accessory lens (5 pack only). These kits came in Lexan: Iridium, Clear, Grey; Standard: Clear, Grey; No Fog: Clear; Polarized: Grey

H2O Frame came in both Grey and Orange Iridium, which matches the Japanese Flyer. Looking quickly at a 1992 UK price list, it also mentions that 'Watercraft Goggles' come in Grey and Iridium (not specified, but we'll assume the same Orange Iridium since the SKUs match and all non-specified Iridium has ended up being Orange so far)



I still don't have my archive back up, so I can't access the original documents, but hopefully I outlined them well enough above to draw some connection with those as well from a Catalog view, rather than these price lists.
GRFMotorsports
.Greg .F
Apr 16, 2015 3:07 PM
Cool stuff Dann.... your always digging into the depths of Oakley past
Dann
Dann Thombs
Apr 16, 2015 4:58 PM
Just fortunate enough to have had some of the old price lists sent my way. I just got the DB updated with the information above, and some of the speculation purged until I can confirm it 100%. The Haze frames (Berry Haze, Purple Haze, Venom) where a crackle effect was added to the existing flat colors are still outstanding. I have some more solid info on the Gen 2/Thin Stretch editions, but also have some ads showing them with the Classic logo. The ads don't tend to get into confirmed colorways or even lens options, so I only know they exist.

The MX options are on the 1991 M Frame price list, so I'll tackle those next, and then revisit the Japanese flyer to see if I can at least cross reference things.
Bazooka
Scott Bowers
Mar 31, 2017 6:37 PM
Dann,

I'm continuously blown away at the level of detail and specifics you and the O-Review family have extracted.

For goggles. I'm not too good with exact release dates, but let me hit on some areas that you have observed or circling around.

First, the original goggle, simply called the Oakley Goggle, died a fast death. Jim went on and partnered with a legendary designer and engineer named George Tackles and they went on to create the O Frame. There are a few other names such as 0/20, 0/90, but they were all O Frames and we departed from the complexity of those names.

The O frame was revolutionary for its fit (conical shape to match face shapes), impact resistance, anti glare texture, peripheral/up and down vision, removable tear off post tabs.

Later the O Frame became the foundation frame for the first ski goggles as well.

Based on the shape of the O Frame, the L (large) Frame was created. Wider, deeper with foam cutouts to fit over prescription glasses and temples.

Until the Crowbar for MX and the A Frame for snow came along the O Frame and L Frame was the chassis frames for all MX and snow goggles. Same frames for both.

A few different face masked existed early on, but the ATFM (Advanced Tactical Face Mask) and Half Mask were the best and last face masks developed for the O and L Frame. ATFM was packaged for sale with a Half Mask. Half Mask could be bought separately. The reason is that full face helmets were just getting popular. The ATFM was losing popularity, but the Half Mask covered the face area between the goggle and the nose area of a full face helmet.

MX Goggle lineup: O Frame (single density face foam), L Frame (idual density face foam), both standard with clear Lexan lenses. Then came along the Pro Frame MX with dual density foam and an Iridium coated Lexan lens. I recall the dual foam being so popular we later either added it as Pro Frame MX, or made the dual foam standard across all MX Frames. I can't recall specifics.

For snow we used the exact same O and L Frame chassis, but with snow specific "dual" lenses (except E Frame). The snow goggle ad earlier in the thread describes what a dual lens is and what it does.

Snow goggle lineup: E (economy) Frame (single density foam, single acetate lens with NoFogium anti fog coating). O Frame with (single density foam, dual vented anti fog lens), L Frame (dual foam with dual vented anti fog lens), Pro Frame (dual vented anti fog lens, dual density face foam) and Pro Frame Iridium.

The O Frame was a significant product in Oakley history. It was a great design that was very hard to beat. We kept the momentum with many different color combinations and was also the first goggle that we used "print paint" or hydro dipped graphics. You mention the Hazes, Venom, etc. We were clearly the first to use this graphic technology in the optical space and goggles were a great canvas. Unfortunately, it did kill the splatter and hand painted stuff.

Again I don't remember specific launch dates, but I recall it being around 1983 for the first snow goggles and Iridium being introduced in 1988.

The H20 goggle also came into the mix in the late 80's focused on the fast growing personal water craft market.

Other nuances/comments:
_Not sure how you define the "stretch logo". I'm assuming it was due to the switch in logos on the frame and not the strap. We made the switch to the stretch Oakley in the goggle mold as we thought that was going to be our next logo. It turned out the stretch logo didn't stand out very well and was hard to work with so we moved to the Ellipse Icon as the primary branding on all goggles. It was bold, identifiable and stood out well at camera level.

_While we are on the topic of "Stretch". Long story that goes beyond simply the logo, but I think this will give clarity to other brand and sunglass style questions. Later Stretch was a sunglass style initiative headed up by Jamin Jannard. Kind of a sub brand that was limited distribution styles only focused on the action sports and youth segments. It was a strategy to combat Oakley getting larger and losing a little bit of touch with the core action sports demographic. You have identified the styles in your database for Stretchline, but you also need to include FatCat.

_The Stretch initiative shortly gave way to Square O. Mostly because the Stretch collection wasn't selling that well and Gascan (with Square O logo) was on fire, especially in the coveted core action sports market that was vital to our image. Square O logo then became the logo differentiation for Oakley "lifestyle". The round or "Ellipse" represented all things performance. The Ellipse remained the brand mark.

_Here's some trivia for how Square O originated. In the beginning it was not a determined product strategy as it may have appeared. If you recall, Gascan was the first style that departed from Oakley's design ID of rounded finishes. Gascan was angular. Jim hated the way the round Ellipse logo looked on the Gascan and told the designers to come up with a square version of the that better matched the angular styling of the Gascan. For marketing, this was a crazy maker. We could have easily said that Oakley is non conventional and the Square O is just another version of our Icon. However, everyone needed a story to tell about the differentiation and what it stood for. We ended up with the Ellipse logo being used on all things with performance intended and the Square O for all things that are more lifestyle intended. You could see this logo demarcation run through all product categories.

Lastly, for snow I should mention the adaptation of the Polaric Ellipsoid lens geometry starting with the A Frame. Applying this technology really changed the importance of using goggles. Finally an optically correct goggle that brought the importance of using goggles to the masses. It was also the first goggle to really break the $100 price point barrier.

All for now, hit me with any other questions you might have.

Scott
Bazooka
Scott Bowers
Mar 31, 2017 7:40 PM
A couple other quick notes:

For the O Frame there was a mold update where we added the small ports in the bottom of the frame. All aesthetic and I don't recall the year we made the update. It feels like around 2000 that you seem to recognize in the Database as "new" O Frame.

Also, the addition of an MX E Frame a couple of years ago? I searched it and it does come up. However, I see the E Frame MX does not exist on the Oakley website and looks to be changed to O Frame 2.0 Heritage. My bet is somebody originally naming it got their history mixed up and originally called it E Frame MX when it should have been O Frame. As history goes the E Frame was only in snow.

Also, the O Frame 2.0 MX and the O Frame 2.0 Snow look to be missing from the Database. Both are the same frames, but the lens technology is different between MX and Snow applications. Nonetheless, these are after my time so they must be recent additions. I'm guessing 2016.

Scott
Dann
Dann Thombs
Mar 31, 2017 8:13 PM
Well this made my day. I think it answered pretty much most of my questions. It's not often we get primary sources to verify things, as usually it's a long process of deduction.


Later the O Frame became the foundation frame for the first ski goggles as well.

Perfect, this was my theory.

L (large) Frame, E (economy) Frame

Ah, this was new for me. We had some running assumption that eventually the entire Company name was going to be spelled out in Goggle frames. O-A-K-L-E-Y. There was never a K or Y Frame, but I do have a digital copy of an ad touting the P Frame...which obviously never actually appeared. Oddly this has the original logo on the frame, but stretch on the ad:



MX Goggle lineup: O Frame (single density face foam), L Frame (idual density face foam), both standard with clear Lexan lenses. Then came along the Pro Frame MX with dual density foam and an Iridium coated Lexan lens.

Supports my early findings of Iridium being a 'Pro' option, but I was most likely blind to the Snow options. Makes sense for MX since you're not dealing with snow glare.


Snow goggle lineup: E (economy) Frame (single density foam, single acetate lens with NoFogium anti fog coating). O Frame with (single density foam, dual vented anti fog lens), L Frame (dual foam with dual vented anti fog lens), Pro Frame (dual vented anti fog lens, dual density face foam) and Pro Frame Iridium.

This makes sense, but why was there an O Frame with Iridium listed in the 1988 price list, but never again. I'd chalk it up to a mistake if it were in an ad, but there were sku's and colorways:


http://oakley.decemberized.com/Goggles/1988/Goggles_September_1988.pdf

We were clearly the first to use this graphic technology in the optical space and goggles were a great canvas. Unfortunately, it did kill the splatter and hand painted stuff.

Until the collector marker emerged; that one is a tricky double-edged sword. I'm glad I try to collect information rather than $700 gascans, heh. Just my $0.02

Again I don't remember specific launch dates, but I recall it being around 1983 for the first snow goggles and Iridium being introduced in 1988.

That matches my records. I'm 13 years and thousands of records deep into the database, so I can't recall where I got most information. I just try to trust that I knew what I was doing at the time.

The H20 goggle also came into the mix in the late 80's focused on the fast growing personal water craft market.

From the marketing material, it seems they are similar to the MX frame but with extra vents and hydrophobic coating. Sort of along the lines of the Water Jacket vs Racing Jacket.

Not sure how you define the "stretch logo". I'm assuming it was due to the switch in logos on the frame and not the strap.

Yes, just on the frame. The (what we call) Classic Logo, then the Stretch, then the Icon. Straps seemed to be independent, and often reverted when the 30th anniversary of Oakley passed, and retro styles/historical references were in.

Regarding the Stretchline, I have a few articles on the subject.

http://o-review.com/forum_detail.php?ID=10717

I currently working on a ton of things for the site, but getting these articles more readily accessible is high on that list. I was sort of on the fence at first, but soon grew to embrace them.

For the definition of Stretch, it's two-fold. I started the site in 2004 with little historical knowledge. A few early members helped get me up to speed, but at that point 'stretch' was only on the Goggles and Wires (1994-1998). Right after that the Stretchline collection debuted, so we saw that re-emergence of the logo, but bold. For the sake of clarity, the 90's version we dub Thin-Stretch, and the latter Heavy-Stretch. The re-issue of the E/T/Square Wire a few years ago also converted the Thinstretch to heavy stretch on the arms.



Jim hated the way the round Ellipse logo looked on the Gascan and told the designers to come up with a square version of the that better matched the angular styling of the Gascan.

With the recent departure of the Square O, this sentiment was shared by a lot of people. The elliptical icon just looks funny on the lifestyle pieces. The reasoning was pretty much in line with how you mentioned the initial reaction was shock. They're backpedaling to reach that safe zone for brand identity.

For the O Frame there was a mold update where we added the small ports in the bottom of the frame. All aesthetic and I don't recall the year we made the update. It feels like around 2000 that you seem to recognize in the Database as "new" O Frame.

1999/2000 saw a lot of updates. A few: the O Matter formula was improved so the frames weren't so brittle. The first wave of Jacket sunglasses stay safely on my shelf. I get nervous even touching them. True Metal icons appears to replace the molded icons. Most O Matter options were rebranded as 'New' models, while the Wires became 2.0 versions.

Also, the addition of an MX E Frame a couple of years ago?

It's this one. I picked it up due to the striking resemblance to the 1980 Oakley Goggle. The price point was $30, so cheaper then the 90's release, and not too much more than the 80's. I assume simple curved Lexan vs the optically corrected lenses of other modern releases. Only three colors appeared and soon disappeared. I don't doubt that sometimes naming schemes get confusing. Here we are in this thread, still trying to hash them out after all.



I also did a video on them, and the box says E Frame MX



Also, the O Frame 2.0 MX and the O Frame 2.0 Snow look to be missing from the Database. Both are the same frames, but the lens technology is different between MX and Snow applications. Nonetheless, these are after my time so they must be recent additions. I'm guessing 2016.

Yes, I'm VERY far behind in Goggle updates. There's just so many of them. I do have copies of the catalogs in digital format, so I will play catchup one of these days. I need to work on my database entry forms though to make large data imports easier. My carpel tunnel will kill me loading hundreds of colorways.
 
 
1/2

O-Review Logo & Design
© 2004-2024 Atom Crown Design and DCJ Productions.
Product Images, Logos and Artwork © 1975-2024 Oakley Inc.
All personal photos © 2004-2024 by their owners...or Rick.