hey Phil, no prob! anytime to show off some Oakleys... Ed, thanks for the comments! ^_^
hey EC, i can't compare with any of the Performance watches as i don't have any, but the keeper on the Analogs are pretty soft, although the original Crush has a bit more trouble with the strap getting in. as for the Unobtanium band itself, they're precurved into the body of the watch as Phil mentioned, so they're pretty comfortable. as for the keeper on the Performance watches, i remember reading that they tend to tear from usage.
Scooby, do you ever find yourself sniffing at the Unobtanium band every now and then, cos i do... ^_^ they do smell like vanilla. as for the Crush looking like the Bullet, i totally don't mind a cheaper watch looking almost exactly like one that's over two times more expensive. i actually like the Crush's design a bit more than the Crush 2.0, the O icon is set inside a sculpted indent, while on the Crush 2.0 it looks like it's just applied on the watch face. also, the crystal on the Crush is beveled in the body, reducing risk of scratching while the Crush 2.0 is flush. i also like the Crush's crown design, it looks more unique than the Crush 2.0's ordinary looking chrome crown. what i do like about the Crush 2.0 more is how the Unobtanium band is integrated with the body.
no idea what HSF stands for...
W.B. Ng (bong - 10/29/2004 5:42:20 PM)
------------------------------------------------------------