2/2
 
 
Title
Topic
Date
Start
End
Count
Comment
Freesh
OAKLEY JUGGERNAUT
Aug 24, 2006 8:01 PM
Aww look at you Paul ! Lovely ! Very cool to see a picture of you in your environment, your home really. Will post updated pics of Mtl as soon as I get a chance.
O-Whores
Thread Killers
Aug 26, 2006 9:43 AM
Damn Paul! You beat us to it! =P

While we were in Oahu, we saw the new 3.0 at an O Store and got all excited! Wanted to share with our bretheren... We got pics of the glasses but Paul's are much better.

Instead, here's a cool shot of Dawn sporting the Square Wire 3.0:
Iggy
i Q
Aug 25, 2006 5:06 PM
Damn, that's a good shot, Whores. I'm convinced to go out and get one now! Can they not come down to Oz sooner?!
cycling-pablo
Paul Sollenberger
Aug 25, 2006 8:43 PM
ok, you cant say my shot was better than yalls, we just snapped some "here ya go" pics while there was a lacking of customers. Yall got the nice close up and good detail shot everyone has been askin for.
zev5740
Hip to be Square-O
Aug 25, 2006 8:50 PM
Damn they look nice. Here's to hopin there's a T-Wire 3.0 based on this in the works.
bong
Wilson Ng
Aug 25, 2006 9:13 PM
very nice O-Whores... fits Dawn nice. i posted another photo of myself wearing the new Square Wires in the PW thread.
as i mentioned before, they're pretty weighty, so a Titanium version would definitely help. however, they're probably going to be called Ti-Square Wire instead, as they did the same for the SW2.
hotguy6919
Aug 25, 2006 11:31 PM
are these the same size as the 2.0?
Pez
The Dispenser of Truth. Jason Wong
Aug 25, 2006 11:46 PM
ok after seeing that last pic my opinion has changed a little :) those do look pretty darn nice! I don't know if I'm gonna buy a pair anytime soon (S.O. would tear my body in half) but I could definately see owning a pair.
O-Whores
Thread Killers
Aug 26, 2006 4:27 AM
They are quite noticably bigger than the SW 2.0, but they are certainally not huge.

Can't wait to get a pair for Dawn...she looks much better in them!
bong
Wilson Ng
Aug 27, 2006 9:03 AM
some quick and dirty comparison shots...


zev5740
Hip to be Square-O
Aug 27, 2006 9:43 AM
So what your saying Bong, is that they're bigger....JK thanks for the pics
Iggy
i Q
Aug 27, 2006 9:48 AM
Wow, they almost look Big Square Wire big. How do they compare to your Chisel, bong?
O-minous
Eshan W.
Aug 27, 2006 2:39 PM
Thanx for that Bong.. they do look BSW Big.
Freesh
OAKLEY JUGGERNAUT
Aug 27, 2006 6:59 PM
No Bill, OBVIOUSLY Bong is trying to show you that they are DARKER !

Com'on guys it's Sunday morning and I'm alone at the store, gimme a chance !
O-Whores
Thread Killers
Aug 28, 2006 3:29 AM
Wow...didn't realize they were that much bigger than the 2.0 was. Thanks for the pics!
Icon208
I Con
Aug 28, 2006 6:34 PM
They're very close to the 2.0 width-wise, just much taller.

The orbitals are EXACTLY what you'd expect the Why 8.2 to look like if it wasn't rimless.
Tick
sees you
Aug 28, 2006 7:54 PM
The corners look a bit more...well... square than the older one's too. Am I correct or is it just the angle?
Icon208
I Con
Aug 28, 2006 8:46 PM
Correct. They're not as rounded as 2.0.
brian
Brian Keim
Aug 30, 2006 8:55 AM
Pics now up on O.com
OsmosisJones
Justin "Scorpion Zero" Jones
Aug 30, 2006 10:05 AM
DAMN! Now I gotta get me a pair! These are killer.

At first I didn't care too much, but now that the pics are up, I'm in love.
EastCoast
E C
Aug 30, 2006 4:14 PM
Did I read here that the spring hinge mechanism is different than other Wires? Someone weigh in please.
BrianJ1888
Brian Johnson
Aug 30, 2006 6:44 PM
i don't know if it's mechanically different, but it looks smaller (less bulky). I, for one, hate the feel of the Oakley springs. I'd love the old three-part sandwich hinge like the A-Wire's.
2/2
 
 

O-Review Logo & Design
© 2004-2024 Atom Crown Design and DCJ Productions.
Product Images, Logos and Artwork © 1975-2024 Oakley Inc.
All personal photos © 2004-2024 by their owners...or Rick.