Can anybody tell me about the sizing on these? The Inmate and Deviation fit me very well, as I have a big head.

Anything smaller is a no go.

I haven't been this excited about a pair of Oakleys in a long time

I tried them on at my local store a week ago. Lens sizing is much smaller than a either an Inmate or Deviation. I would have picked them up but they didnt have the colorway I was looking for.

I was thinking more of the overall size. Will either fit a head that can barley handle a deviation or inmate?

@kaanan
If you can barely fit those I'd say no on both of these frames.
The Deviation Fits Me just right and I can barely fit the Tincan/foil
The sizing for both is 58mm for lens width 15mm for the nose bridge and it has a 131mm arm.

I was also very excited about these... WAS... I am sending back 2 pairs of the Ferrari TinCans today. I thought I would give them a shot. The sizing is smaller than the Jupiter I had, which was way too big for me, but these TinCans are still a bit big for me. I had other concerns like incomplete finishing of the arms, the assembly of the nose bridge, the "?" material on the back of the orbitals holding the lenses in. I think its a shame as I really liked the hinges - I thought they were well done, but that was about the only part of them I like, uh... liked past-tense.

Also, I know this is a 'fit' thread, but FYSA - I found the polarization to be less accurate than the Carbon Blades, which was a surprise. They were not as clear, many more shadows, rainbows, and dark spots in the Ferrari TinCans I had. I expected them to be on par, and they were not.

That's too bad. I'll still check them out though as I like the look, and not wearing a pair often isn't a problem usually. All the better to keep it in more pristine condition.

Kanaan:

The deviation is definitely a bigger fit. Tincan/Tinfoil prove to be cool, although narrower.

xmetal40